Blog powered by TypePad

« GLAD's FAQ | Main | Procreation »

December 28, 2003

Poincare conjecture proved?

Mark Kleiman ask what the status is on the possible proof of the Poincare conjecture by Russian mathematician Grigory Perelman.  The above Science News link (via Kleiman) is a great understandable background article on the conjecture, its history, and Perelman's work.  The short answer is that the proof is still neither confirmed nor denied.  The vetting continues. 

Perelman's work appeared as a series of three papers which were made publicly available as preprints in November 2002, March 2003, and July 2003 respectively.  None of them has been officially published yet, and only the first seems to have been extensively reviewed.  For those interested Bruce Kleiner and John Lott (no not that John Lott) maintain a website for notes and commentary on Perelman's papers.  Especially helpful for the more mathematically inclined is Misha Kapovich's notes of a talk he gave on the subject last September. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455f19269e200e55051aec98833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Poincare conjecture proved?:

» Poincare progress? from Off the Kuff
Mark Kleiman recently asked about the status of the Poincare conjecture, which a Russian mathematician named Perelman claims to have... [Read More]

» Poincare conjecture proved? from Mark A. R. Kleiman
A few months ago, Russian mathematician Grigory Perelman reported that he had proven the Pioncare Conjecture. Apparently Perelman is regarded is especially brilliant, so there was good hope he would turn out to be right, but at the time it... [Read More]

Comments

does anyone find it obvious that there is no flow if there is a high enough tempreture? Pearlman is mad. he might be brillian though.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment