Amy Sullivan has a new post explaining further why she supports Clark over Dean. In this one she does quite a nice job of knocking down some of the Deaniac arguments. I get especially annoyed with the "If Dean's not the candidate all those enthusiastic grassroots supporters will stay home" argument. Are there really that many people that are crazy for Dean, but couldn't care less whether Bush remains in office for another four years? I'm not saying Dean is not electable, but electability is the most important consideratioin in selecting our candidate. Which canidate is more likey to beat Bush should be a prime consideration of voters in the primaries. The candidate with the best shot is the one that will best appeal to the swing voters in the swing states. Of course I also believe Clark would make the better president, but that's just an extra benefit. I'm not surprised that some of my favorite bloggers like Amy Sullivan, Kevin Drum, and Mark Kleiman support him as well.
Recent Comments